Submitted by David Emmett on Fri, 2016-07-22 16:53 at motomatters.com website.
The FIM have published a report into the crash in Barcelona, in which Moto2 rider Luis Salom lost his life. The report was drawn up based on information from Technical Director Danny Aldridge and Director of Technology Corrado Cecchinelli, as well as analysis of the data by an independent telemetry expert, Lluis Lleonart Gomez, who was appointed by Luis Salom's family.
The report reaches a number of conclusions. The first is that there is no evidence of mechanical failure on the part of the bike. The right clipon, holding the throttle and brake assembly, was found to be loose when the bike was examined after the crash. However, this could be put down to crash damage, as clipons often come loose when the bike hits the ground. Salom's bike slid on its right side before impacting the wall, and this is the most likely cause of that damage.
The rear wheel was also damaged, but data from the (compulsory) pressure sensors showed that rear tire pressure was at the recommended pressure of 1.5 bar when the bike crashed. The most likely cause of the rear wheel damage was when the bike hit the wall, the air fence not being sufficient to absorb the impact of the bike. On the CCTV footage, it appeared that the rear wheel hit the wall first, catapulting the bike back onto the tarmac runoff and hitting Luis Salom in the chest.
The data from Luis Salom's Kalex was analyzed by an independent data engineer, Lluis Lleonart Gomez. Gomez was appointed by Salom's family, and is an experienced data engineer, currently working in the FIM CEV Moto2 championship with the MR Griful team for Ana Carrasco...
...continue here
The Technical Director Report is as follows:
Crash of N°39 Luis Salom during Moto2 FP2 of the Catalunya GP
This report has been prepared based on the inspection of the motorcycle by the Technical Director and the Director of Technology and examination of telemetry data carried out at the Montmelo circuit in the immediate aftermath of the accident. The machine was then sealed with tamperproof plastic seals and handed to the custody of judicial expert Angl Calzada Gomez. A further inspection of the machine took place in the presence of SAG team members, the Salom family and an independent telemetry expert, Lluis Lleonart Gomez, appointed by the family, when the motorcycle was returned to the Team on 29 of June 2016.
Α. Machine Condition
Immediately after the crash, the motorcycle of Luis Salom was delivered directly to the Technical Bay located in Pit Box.
During an inspection of the motorcycle it was noticed that the “throttle” handlebar was loose and could easily be removed from the clamp that connects it to the fork leg. It is likely that this could be as a result of the crash.
The rear wheel had extensive damage, resulting in one part collapsing in on itself. This type of damage is common when the wheel impacts with a solid object after a high speed crash. There is no evidence that the wheel was faulty or in any way caused the accident.
Front and rear tyres were inspected and were in good condition with the front tyre still inflated. The data showed the rear tyre pressure was at the recommended pressure of 1.4bar at the time of the incident. This confirms that the rear rim failure is a consequence of, and not a cause, of the accident.
The remainder of the motorcycle display d damage to its bodywork consistent with a high speed crash. There were no other mechanical issues found on the motorcycle that were of any concern.
The condition of the machine and the initial conclusions were confirmed during the second inspection.
Data analysis
The data recorded by the ECU of the machine was downloaded and a comparison initially made between data from the relevant section of the track on a previous lap and the same section on the lap that the crash happened. The data is reproduced below. Mr. Gomez subsequently downloaded data from the rider’s fastest lap and made comparisons between that lap and the lap on which the crash happened.
The upper part of the graphic is from a previous lap at turn 12.
The lower part of the graphic is the data from the crash into turn 12.
The upper graphic throttle data (In yellow) shows a typically normal throttle closing just prior to applying brake pressure before corner entry.
The lower graphic throttle data looks uncommon because instead of completely closing it shows the throttle partly closing to approximately 45% for a period of around 0.3 seconds before fully closing.
After the throttle is fully closed, brake pressure (In pink) is applied.
The larger movements in the front and rear suspension (Red & Green respectively) during braking on the lower graphic, after the throttle is closed, show instability of the bike just before the front speed reduces quickly indicating loss of control of the front of the bike resulting in a crash.
Confirming the initial analysis Mr. Gomez reported that his data showed that at the time of the accident the bike was 4 Km slower than its fastest lap but at the time of braking the rider was 7 or 8 meters closer to the curve than on his fastest lap. He confirmed that on the piece of straight between the two curves, there was a partial cut in the throttle.
Mr. Gomez speculated that the rider may have looked back and when returning to look forward misread his position, or was a little off line. This could have resulted in higher than usual brake pressure being applied, which was indicated on the telemetry. As a result of being off line and the braking with the machine being banked the front wheel lost traction resulting in the crash.
Mr. Gomez confirmed that he could not see anything unusual that he felt was of any concern. He also confirmed that there was no evidence in the data that raised issue with the track surface including possible bumps.
Danny Aldridge
MotoGP Technical Director
17 July 2016







Σχόλια